打印

man utd買ballack係咪真係幫到手呢?

joeyinet

銀牌會員

Rank: 5

足總顧問

威望: 2278
閱讀權限: 50
註冊時間: 18-10-2005
最後登錄: 17-10-2009

當前離線

1^# 大中小發表於 18-10-2005 10:48 AM 只看該作者

man utd買ballack係咪真係幫到手呢?

多個header好既人....多個人scholes又可以踢返前d...做下one two...scholes做holding mf...好似唔係好得.....上前射波我諗會好d.

咁但係又會同ronney重疊...
我諗輪流返後都可以既........

anyway..買左先!

TOP

onemanfly

銀牌會員

Rank: 5

威望: 1132
閱讀權限: 50
註冊時間: 14-10-2005
最後登錄: 11-5-2009

當前離線

2^# 大中小發表於 18-10-2005 11:01 AM 只看該作者

Every team would like to have a guy like Ballack

But I hate him always diving in the game, PUSSY !!!

Just look at Park Chi Sing, he will jump right up and continue chasing the ball even he has been kicked down by other players. That's how we play like a MAN !!!

TOP

GR上杉圭

版主

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7

威望: 2852
閱讀權限: 100
註冊時間: 17-10-2005
最後登錄: 12-3-2015

當前離線

3^# 大中小發表於 18-10-2005 11:57 AM 只看該作者

就算manunit 買到佢都要買返過防中/同keane續約~
ballack 始終攻強於守~
諗住頂keane 個位就嘥氣~

加油呀!!上杉圭!!

TOP

joeyinet

銀牌會員

Rank: 5

足總顧問

威望: 2278
閱讀權限: 50
註冊時間: 18-10-2005
最後登錄: 17-10-2009

當前離線

4^# 大中小發表於 18-10-2005 12:20 PM 只看該作者

but i think ballack at least better than scholes..
and keane cannot play too many game...

vs weak team - schole and ballack
vs strong team - ballack + keane...

do you guys believe this is a possibile solution?

and also ..C.Ron also wanna dive....同浪射太多,.

TOP

myth

金牌會員

Rank: 6 Rank: 6

威望: 4556
閱讀權限: 60
註冊時間: 16-10-2005
最後登錄: 6-11-2008

當前離線

5^# 大中小發表於 18-10-2005 07:32 PM 只看該作者

Park Chi Sing is a good player in MU, i like him most.

TOP

dieman7

註冊會員

Rank: 2 Rank: 2

威望: 79
閱讀權限: 20
註冊時間: 16-10-2005
最後登錄: 16-5-2012

當前離線

6^# 大中小發表於 19-10-2005 01:04 AM 只看該作者

買到先算啦...曼聯出手咁低....

其實用番alan smith實際...起碼場場都見佢瞓低幾次鏟波....有heart喎...如果真係買到ballack....搵佢替scholes....十年都仲係踢緊佢...好悶呀

TOP

dieman7

註冊會員

Rank: 2 Rank: 2

威望: 79
閱讀權限: 20
註冊時間: 16-10-2005
最後登錄: 16-5-2012

當前離線

7^# 大中小發表於 19-10-2005 01:05 AM 只看該作者

買到先算啦...曼聯出手咁低....

其實用番alan smith實際...起碼場場都見佢瞓低幾次鏟波....有heart喎...如果真係買到ballack....搵佢替scholes....十年都仲係踢緊佢...好悶呀

TOP

booking

版主

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7

威望: 652
閱讀權限: 100
註冊時間: 13-10-2005
最後登錄: 1-7-2018

當前離線

8^# 大中小發表於 19-10-2005 06:15 AM 只看該作者

引用:

Originally posted by dieman7 at 2005-10-19 01:05 AM:
其實用番alan smith實際...起碼場場都見佢瞓低幾次鏟波....有heart喎...如果真係買到ballack....搵佢替scholes....十年都仲係踢緊佢...好悶呀

agree....

TOP

booking

版主

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7

威望: 652
閱讀權限: 100
註冊時間: 13-10-2005
最後登錄: 1-7-2018

當前離線

9^# 大中小發表於 19-10-2005 06:18 AM 只看該作者

引用:

Originally posted by onemanfly at 2005-10-18 11:01 AM:
But I hate him always diving in the game, PUSSY !!!

Just look at Park Chi Sing, he will jump right up and continue chasing the ball even he has been kicked down by other players. That's how we p ...

This is a kind of SKILL

TOP

booking

版主

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7

威望: 652
閱讀權限: 100
註冊時間: 13-10-2005
最後登錄: 1-7-2018

當前離線

10^# 大中小發表於 19-10-2005 06:20 AM 只看該作者

引用:

Originally posted by joeyinet at 2005-10-18 12:20 PM:
but i think ballack at least better than scholes..
and keane cannot play too many game...

vs weak team - schole and ballack
vs strong team - ballack + keane...

do you guys believe this is ...

換領隊最實際！！！！

TOP