Delete post by Phantomhorse.

[ 本帖最後由 phantomhorse 於 20-3-2006 02:34 PM 編輯 ]

引用:

原帖由 Lee-Hom 於 19-3-2006 10:35 AM 發表



phantomhorse (you) 的video form

Phantomhorse bro 做video form?  自己一個人做??  Crazy guy:em44:

No ah.. maybe I am the one to consolidate data of video form.

Variables are much more than we expect per the answer I got last nite. Over 30, 50, 70, 90, 110 variables? You guess :p

Let's consider later. But it takes a lot of time on developing the corect coefficients... Marshal, GR math guy?

引用:

原帖由 coffee 於 19-3-2006 10:20 AM 發表

只是話每場都有可能多過一隻乎？

Of course more than 1 horse in most races. That is good. Can go for Q, QP, or T whenever the E is positive.

So I think "powerfulbet" is useful because it already solves those problems. But I am not sure if they use Kelly's formula. If find some guys to write a program, it costs time and money. Need to further consider.

引用:

原帖由 coffee 於 19-3-2006 10:30 AM 發表
同 Marshal 傾過，他認為評分應分五級，留返第三級作中间不肯定之馬，一及二級為下風馬，四及五級為上風馬。我個人認為此grading system相當rational，而所有variable亦以此化繁為簡之方法開始再分weightin ...

GR also mentioned some variables in Gallop racing! I also believe those are valuable but will be difficult to work out coefficients. OK, agree to consolidate less variables for which we are advanced to the public.

let me learn sth from u... we discuss later. finish today racing first!