引用:

原帖由 冷T愛好者 於 5-2-2007 11:46 AM 發表
表面越易賭...越易贏的賭法...越容易令人...沉淪！

這是我說的:smile_38::smile_38::smile_38:

《沉淪》是郁達夫的著作，冷T兄果然有水準。
沉淪 ... 之後 ... 沒頂 ， 即係死得人多！這是我說的:smile_30:

Dont know... But I think it is good for public because the prof wont pay attention to this small pool. Not profitable...

i think it is good to bet hot horse under the existing tax system. say, when 50% of bets is on the first group, then the total tax is about 9% whereas it would be 17.5% last year. Let's see the hedge odds vs the "fun" odds!

引用:

原帖由 冷T愛好者 於 5-2-2007 17:00 發表

完全唔出奇...當全部亞[蟬]認為(1組)必贏硬時派10蚊零1毫都唔出奇...因馬會冇定出最低派彩額(相信馬會亦不會事先定出...最低派彩額！

最低派 $10.1 .... :smile_48:

引用:

原帖由 冷T愛好者 於 5-2-2007 17:35 發表
原來有定出左...
到時唔知有冇預計派彩的呢...即1組...2組...3組...預計派彩有多少?

自己上馬會網睇一睇 .... 就唔使問咁多啦 .... :smile_45:

http://www.hkjc.com/chinese/news/news_2007013015168.htm

http://www.hkjc.com/chinese/corp ... s_2007020515214.htm



[ 本帖最後由 Forest 於 5-2-2007 07:57 PM 編輯 ]

各分組所佔的百份比

引用:

原帖由 xmas8888 於 5-2-2007 09:50 PM 發表
各分組所佔的百份比

thankx

2.. 1.5..1.7???

But I wont bet. If horse cant run suddenly, I cant get my bet back. so. never bet or only bet at the very last second.

我推斷fun組回報率會比買位置更低....
如其中一組認為有2-3隻必win馬...何不投Q及位置Q?
如只得一匹當博Win? 為何我要買多幾隻?
如賠率平均介於1.5-5倍...是否位置更值博?
個人而言...此玩法絕不吸引...
除非閣下能保持高命中率...否基本上長賭必輸...
馬會高招....馬迷會常中....但錢亦常輸....

[ 本帖最後由 okimg 於 6-2-2007 12:15 PM 編輯 ]

The overall return is close to P. Long term bet P or bet Fun group = suicide.

Only bet when the hot horse is rejected to run before gate!

I believe this pool will fail.

引用:

原帖由 phantomhorse 於 6-2-2007 12:37 PM 發表
The overall return is close to P. Long term bet P or bet Fun group = suicide.

Only bet when the hot horse is rejected to run before gate!

I believe this pool will fail.

係又係喎...如全熱門開閘前退出...飛數應無回得咁快...可能有數為.

Fun組彩池應比四連環更細...

[ 本帖最後由 okimg 於 6-2-2007 12:57 PM 編輯 ]