I set 30,000 capital. max 2,500. 10 bets. Q + QP.
If I have 2 selections, I set "extra confident" for the first choice, and then set "confident" for the second choice. Even though without providing "dead fire horses", the results are much better than my expectation. At least, from the module test, the results are better than my actual bets.
If I have 1 selection horse, I set "confident" and let the program run.
Due to my betting strategy, my betting amount is not proportional to my confidence. It worked pretty good when I was "in form", my capital went up to 210% in November. However, when I was not "in form", captial dropped to 130% within 1 month. And then, was not confident enough and I maintained the range from 90% to 150%. Luckily I was sucessful in a few critical moments. Because I cannot rely on luck so much, have to find out better solution if I want to stay betting horses.
If I used the program, my capital might have gone to 160% while I reached 210%. But surely, my captial might have been able to maintain 150% while in the reality it went to under 130% because many of my choices turned out 2nd and 4th in DEC and JAN. IT HURTS.
Maybe the final results do not vary a lot, but the fluctuation affects my confidence... it is very important. If I did not win a Q + QP recently, I must have been losing now! It is a big impact from double capital to losing so quickly. I think all bros here can understand.
[ 本帖最後由 phantomhorse 於 17-3-2006 01:05 PM 編輯 ]