Do you think it is on 9 if you bet on ¥b¥þ³õ ©M©M?
look at the following example.
what can you tell?

[ ¥»©«³Ì«á¥Ñ coffee ©ó 20-6-2009 09:30 AM ½s¿è ]

¥b¥þ³õ ©M©M 4.8
¥b³õ ©M 2.05
¥þ³õ ©M 3.3

2.05+3.3=5.35... much better than 4.8

¥b¥þ³õ ©M©M 4.8 - Possibility ¥b³õ ©M + ¥þ³õ ©M @4.8

¥b³õ ©M 2.05

¥þ³õ ©M 3.3 - Possibility ¥b³õ ¥D/«È/©M + ¥þ³õ ©M => 3 possibilities !

Case Study : [Amended on 22/6/2009]
¥b³õ ©M $100 @ 2.05 + ¥þ³õ ©M $100 @ 3.3
Result
¥b³õ ©M + ¥þ³õ ©M => $535 [Odds: 535/200 = 2.675 < 4.8]
¥b³õ ¥D/«È + ¥þ³õ ©M => $330 [Odds: 330/200 = 1.650 < 4.8]
¥b³õ ©M + ¥þ³õ ¥D/«È => $205 [Odds: 205/200 = 1.025 < 4.8]
¥b³õ ¥D/«È + ¥þ³õ ¥D/«È => $0 [Total loss]

¥b¥þ³õ ©M-©M $100 @ 4.8
Result
¥b³õ ©M + ¥þ³õ ©M => $480 [Odds: 4.8]
¥b³õ ¥D/«È + ¥þ³õ ©M => $0 [Total Loss]
¥b³õ ©M + ¥þ³õ ¥D/«È => $0 [Total Loss]
¥b³õ ¥D/«È + ¥þ³õ ¥D/«È => $0 [Total loss]

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ goalkeeper ©ó 20-6-2009 09:51 AM µoªí
¥b¥þ³õ ©M©M 4.8 - Possibility ¥b³õ ©M + ¥þ³õ ©M @4.8

¥b³õ ©M 2.05

¥þ³õ ©M 3.3 - Possibility ¥b³õ ¥D/«È/©M + ¥þ³õ ©M => 3 possibilities !

Case Study :
¥b³õ ©M $100 @ 2.05 + ¥þ³õ ©M $100 @ 3.3 ...

I dun agree.
if you bet ©M©M, you must have first half draw and full time draw.
if betting 200, you can get 960

if betting ¥b³õ ©M ¥þ³õ ©M provided it is all bingo, it should be like gor kwan 2.05 x 3.3 = 6.77
the odds should be 6.77 but not 4.8.
but hkjc has no such combination, and it is absolutely pay a lower odds

looking at the other view, if betting ¥b³õ ©M but turns out full time not draw (or vice versa), you can buy an insurance.
it looks better in the long run.

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ coffee ©ó 20-6-2009 10:31 AM µoªí

I dun agree.
if you bet ©M©M, you must have first half draw and full time draw.
if betting 200, you can get 960

if betting ¥b³õ ©M ¥þ³õ ©M provided it is all bingo, it should be like gor kwan 2 ...

For the highlighted part, betting more doesn't mean high odds. The odds is still equal to 4.8.
Since it's not ŸÄÃö, the odds will never be 2.05 x 3.3 = 6.765.  That's the reason why I show all the possibilities for different cases.

i agree with goalkeeper
and
"¥b¥þ³õ ©M©M 4.8
¥b³õ ©M 2.05
¥þ³õ ©M 3.3

2.05+3.3=5.35... much better than 4.8"
this is wrong.. ..how come u just add up the odds..

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ goalkeeper ©ó 20-6-2009 05:04 PM µoªí

For the highlighted part, betting more doesn't mean high odds. The odds is still equal to 4.8.
Since it's not ŸÄÃö, the odds will never be 2.05 x 3.3 = 6.765.  That's the reason why I show all the  ...

i know it is not a combination.
but on theory basis, it should be more than 4.8.
HKJC is giving a comparatively lower odds in this pool

¤Þ¥Î:

­ì©«¥Ñ coffee ©ó 20-6-2009 11:12 PM µoªí

i know it is not a combination.
but on theory basis, it should be more than 4.8.
HKJC is giving a comparatively lower odds in this pool

I've amended the case study in order to give you a more clearer picture on why the odds is lower.

¥b³õ ©M $100 @ 2.05 + ¥þ³õ ©M $100 @ 3.3
Result
¥b³õ ©M + ¥þ³õ ©M => $535 [Odds: 535/200 = 2.675 < 4.8]
¥b³õ ¥D/«È + ¥þ³õ ©M => $330 [Odds: 330/200 = 1.650 < 4.8]
¥b³õ ©M + ¥þ³õ ¥D/«È => $205 [Odds: 205/200 = 1.025 < 4.8]
¥b³õ ¥D/«È + ¥þ³õ ¥D/«È => $0 [Total loss]

¥b¥þ³õ ©M-©M $100 @ 4.8
Result
¥b³õ ©M + ¥þ³õ ©M => $480 [Odds: 4.8]
¥b³õ ¥D/«È + ¥þ³õ ©M => $0 [Total Loss]
¥b³õ ©M + ¥þ³õ ¥D/«È => $0 [Total Loss]
¥b³õ ¥D/«È + ¥þ³õ ¥D/«È => $0 [Total loss]

For "¥b³õ ©M $100 @ 2.05 + ¥þ³õ ©M $100 @ 3.30", there are two more chances that you may not total loss and get back the money you bet on.  Ofcoz' the winning odds for these 3 possibilities should be lower than "¥b¥þ³õ ©M-©M".  Otherwise, the odds may become unreasonable.